Key takeaways
- Cutting home office signals control over trust, and that drives good people away.
- Attendance measures presence, not output. Performance belongs tied to the result.
- Remote enables flexible collaboration with exactly the right experts.
I honestly don't understand why more and more companies are scrapping home office. It feels like a step backwards, and above all it sends the wrong signal: we only trust you when we can see you.
Attendance isn't output
Office presence measures who's there, not who gets things done. Tie performance to attendance and you optimise for the visible instead of the result. Good people notice immediately.
And they draw conclusions: talent goes where output counts and where they're trusted to organise their own work. Cutting home office is often a quiet reason to resign.
Remote works, in your projects too
Distributed work has long been reality, including at your clients and in your projects. It enables flexible collaboration with exactly the experts who fit the task, regardless of where they live.
That's the model we live: we activate the right network for each engagement, remote and precise. In a digital, AI-driven work world that's not a compromise, it's the default.
